Case Study – Avoid costly mistakes that affect bid win drilling contracts and ROI

The ROI modelling for the machine was based on successfully supplying the contract plasma cutting/drilling market with two shifts of capacity per day that was going to generate a new source of revenue and cash flow for the business that did not eventuate. This investment, instead of generating new revenue and an ROI within 2 years for the business, has restricted growth whilst the fabricator pays $20K a month in lease repayments for a machine that is underutilised and working 15 weeks a year. Keep an eye out for Contractor XYZ’s business or machine being sold in 18 months time as a result of a poorly specified and underutilised machine being leased that did not close the gap the machine was intended to address.

The consequences and impact can be significant when supplying a price-sensitive part to a competitive market. If you would like to challenge this commentary ask a contract laser cutting business how successful their bid/win ratio would be if they reduced the time it takes to piece a hole by 30%. Most will tell you that either the business would close or the ineffective machine would be sold or relegated to low
tolerance work.

We have all witnessed how simple it is to make these kinds of mistakes when a buyer is moving outside their area of expertise. Fabricators assume that a machine tool builder, that supplies to all five continents, have identified and closed the gaps in their product offering.

What is often discovered, after it is too late, is that the R&D departments from the machine tool builders are outsourced or the machine tool builder is too large to be motivated to change their design to meet the higher specified machines that Specialist Machinery supply. Many machine tool builders do not discuss the limitations of their specification and, when buyers do, it is best to be prepared for the ‘CCC’ sales approach (convince, confuse, con). Some in the machine tool industry are slick at delivering the ‘CCC’ method to first-time buyers. The saying is true ‘buyer beware’. Fabricators and steel service centres, you may be ‘taking a gamble or a punt’ if you do not request evidence-based metrics to base your buying decision on!

RELATED CASE STUDIES & WHITE PAPERS

1. Guaranteed ways to avoid buying the wrong plasma cutting machine with drilling and extra machining capacity.
2. Best practices for attracting NEW customers to your laser cutting business.
3. Clear and unbiased facts about a CNC controller for a plasma cutting machine with drilling and extra machining capacity.
4. Avoid costly mistakes that affect bid/win drilling contracts and ROI.
5. Best practices to ensure the plasma machine specification meet performance outcomes and provide a competitive advantage.
6. Guaranteed ways to ensure your strategy to invest in a plasma machine will close the gap the investment was intended to meet.
7. A guide to specifying the correct coolant delivery systems for a plasma cutting and drilling machine with extra machining capacity.
8. Discover the secrets as to why the market is trending away from automatic percussion marking and moving back to paint marking.
9. How to dominate your niche with the best quality, schedule and cost when deploying this coolant delivery system for drilling.
10. Guaranteed no stress strategy for selecting plasma cutting nesting software.
11. Your most burning questions answered about wet or dry plasma cutting table.
12. You are not alone in specifying a CNC controller and PLC that has built-in redundancy.
13. Secrets to increasing capacity and schedule to complete tasks quickly and efficiently.
14. Avoid the deadly sins when using a boutique machine tool builders home brand nesting and programming software.
15. Worth fighting for, a plasma cutting machine tool builder with cost-effective remote diagnostic support.